2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
Posting this to keep track of any off season suggested rule changes.
1) I would like to discuss possibly changing playoff Seedings to be purely based on record - so seeds 2 and 3 will not necessarily be the division winners. Using same method currently being used in SAC'd. 2) Also, would like to discuss penalty for failing to extend IR players. I would propose those who are not posted to extend, rather then being cut - they are merely placed back on Active Roster of the team, and the team then has time to adjust their roster if needed to fit them into cap requirements. To keep it from being bookkeeping nightmare for IR Supreme Commander, maybe give them until kickoff of first game of week after player loses their IR eligibility? or until they add new player via FA/Trade/etc. ? |
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
I would like to propose a 3 point home team advantage in the playoffs instead of 7....7 seems too high
|
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
Quote:
|
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
Speaking of old guard, are we down to 4 left? Mike, Jim, Pat and Matt?
|
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
I think the line up needs some tweaks too like the ability to have 3Rb as opposed to two or maybe a flex player that could be any position . Jsut a thought.
|
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
Quote:
So we could easily be defeated in rules change votes. lol |
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
In my old age I can see myself coming to terms with the reduction or even elimination of Home Field Advantage, heck maybe even some form of SACD like renegotiation (not quite to the same degree), but allowing a starting formation with 3RBs is just way off the charts for me and not something I could find common ground with!
|
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
I could see a reduction of home field advantage.
But I'm not interested in renegotiation. |
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
Even though I brought it up a few times, at this point I would probably be against renegs also.. Liking that difference between the two leagues in matters of building a team with more available key players each year.
|
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
Quote:
|
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
Quote:
3RBs is not a standard or even occasional formation in the NFL, and therefore has no role in Fantasy IMO. Heck 3TE sets are much more frequent than 3 RBs, and 2 of those TE's are usually blocking (if not all 3). And in fantasy, it's not like you'd be starting a blocking FB or RB for that RB3 slot, it'd be a skilled player that can score. Allowing a team to potentially stackup at the RB position is just not even remotely OK IMO. |
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
I understand we try to stick as close to NFL as possible, but NFL rosters are also 53 players, so sometimes those comparisons go out the window.
Also, the whole team goes on bye in the NFL, not just a few players at random. I didn't think I would like it either, but it's growing on me...I would consider it IMO |
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
Quote:
As for BYES, of course we can't account for them the same, That just is what it is. |
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
My two cents. I play in leagues where 3RBs can be started, and I'm honestly not a fan so I wouldn't support it here. I've always been for eliminating home field advantage. I would compromise for a lower home field like Six suggested. Keep renegs with SACD. I like the two different strategies.
|
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
It was really just an idea for more roster flexibility. I see the point of sticking with nfl rosters but several teams do use more then 3 backs which is why I also suggested a flex position were you could put any player in it . Not trying to rock the boat as the new guy.
|
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
Sorry meant more then 2 backs not 3 .
|
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
Quote:
|
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
Quote:
(And if you don't know that song, you should!) |
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
I would like to suggest we eliminate the trade deadline. (in both leagues)
Here is an article with some good points: https://subscribers.footballguys.com...d=HarstadDiT11 |
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
I could be in favor of that...
|
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
Reduce or eliminate the home field advantage, all for it..
Play 3 RBs - agree with most of the posts, against it.. Reneg, not sure about this one, don't think I would like it, but would need to look into it. Trade dead line. This one I am against, the deadline is there for a reason - so teams won't dump players late in the season - I actually think the trade deadline should be a week or 2 earlier. |
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
Quote:
Or am I missing your point? |
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
I would not suggest that any owner would dump players to stock another team. My concern would be that once a team is eliminated from the playoffs, all the final year contract players become basically worthless to that owner(except possibly for RFA).
Without a trade deadline, teams would be able to trade players up to and into the playoffs. This would encourage eliminated teams to trade players at a deflated price. For example, a top positional player, whose usual value would be a first round pick is now valued by his owner as worthless (or possibly a 2.13 pick by letting him go during RFA). The eliminated team would be foolish not to trade his top positional players on a final year contract for second round picks. Basically, selling his players for under market value and stocking up on second round picks. Yes, this does allow the eliminated teams to hopefully improve their teams the next season, but it also unfairly improves teams that are in the playoffs, by allowing them to add top positional players late and at a deflated price. Owners work all off season and during the regular season to build and improve a team, only to watch eliminated teams trade players at under market value to their opponents. Trading up to and into the playoffs would open the door to an unfair advantage to teams that have done little to nothing all season to improve their team, winning just enough to sneak into the playoffs, then using next year’s draft to gather top talent to take the championship from owners that worked all year. We all know what the trade deadline is, so we need to work all season to make trades to improve our teams before the deadline, not wait until teams are eliminated, then start stripping them bare of their final year top talent. I will go with whatever the league decides, but would strongly oppose no trade deadline or even moving it to a later date. |
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
Appreciate your perspective.
However, I'd think that the league administrators would be able to veto any trade that comes across as undervaluing players. Granted, we haven't had to do much of that... because this league rocks, and owners care, and everyone is playing to win. Good points that should be brought up if and when this becomes a legit rule change issue. Thanks. |
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
Agreed, this is a good group of owners, but even the most well intentioned owner would jump at the chance to "buy" a championship if he could. #Pirate
|
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
Quote:
|
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
I think it would be good to extend to end of season, but not into playoffs.
|
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
I would like to see current IR rules changed. I personally would prefer going back to the original process - 4 week min, no need to return to AR. Anything but the current rules.
|
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
Quote:
I would be ok with this, but would also like to review the criteria for adding a player to IR. Right now, "For a player to be put on IR he must be listed as Questionable, Doubtful or Out on MFL league site." I think, if we make the duration more lax, we need to remove the "Q" or "D" designation. A player would be eligible only if listed as "Out" OR "IR". There are too many players listed with a "Q" or "D" during the week - possibly leave "D" open, but definitely remove "Q" as an allowable IR designation.. |
Re: 2021 Season Rules changes discussions??
Quote:
I agree with Pat, and would prefer we go back to it. Number 1, less confusion. Number 2, does not require anyone to maintain any kind of list or timeline of when to 'cut' players if owner is in infraction. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2000-2022 - Preds Fantasy Football Forums