2016 SAC'D Official RFA Commentary
 

Post your :bs: here

Re: 2016 SAC'D Official RFA Commentary
 

Geeks bid on Baldwin is not a legal bid. Bids at this level (1000 to 1999) must be 20 cb increments.

Re: 2016 SAC'D Official RFA Commentary
 

Nice catch. Looks like Geeks updated bid.

In the future instead of updating the bid, we should just post a new, valid bid to keep the time-stamped bids honest...maybe with a comment that the previous bid was invalid.

Re: 2016 SAC'D Official RFA Commentary
 

Agreed.. but I would also say, just like in poker, no commentary from those not involved in the 'hand'.. in other words Bobby probably shouldn't have said anything and let the invalid bid expire. He didn't do Burt any favors on that one..

Re: 2016 SAC'D Official RFA Commentary
 

:agree::goodpost:

Re: 2016 SAC'D Official RFA Commentary
 

I thought everyone was supposed to point out these things.

Re: 2016 SAC'D Official RFA Commentary
 

It is good sportsmanship...I didn't really have a problem with it.

Re: 2016 SAC'D Official RFA Commentary
 

:agree:

Since we don't have the ability to validate bids, I think it's good to point out mistakes like this.

Re: 2016 SAC'D Official RFA Commentary
 

Pretty slow RFA period so far....guess everyone is set with their teams already...

Re: 2016 SAC'D Official RFA Commentary
 

I can't afford any of these guys, 1st time I've been in this situation. Maybe I can be competitive this year and start a rebuild next year.

Re: 2016 SAC'D Official RFA Commentary
 

Just a reminder, RFA bidding closes on Saturday at midnight EST. So if anyone has people they still want to bid on, get er done...