Pred's Fantasy Football Forums - View Single Post

Royal Hawaiian Opihi · December 5th, 2014, 02:50 PM

Yep. I agree.
Option 1 makes the most sense.
It's a WAIVER CLAIM... it's not a new FA acquisition.
If someone cuts a player for whatever reason, ALL TEAMS should have an equal right to make a claim on that person, regardless of their postseason status.
The one-year rule is ONLY connected to FA pick ups, as playoff teams are the only teams allowed to bid on these players.

I honestly don't know why this isn't a common sense rule.
But we have our rules... so I'll try again this off season.

December 5th, 2014, 02:50 PM	#13
Royal Hawaiian Opihi Feeding Frenzy Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Palmdale, CA Posts: 16,604	Re: Cut WR Michael Floyd, AZ (546/2) - * CLAIM PENDING * Yep. I agree. Option 1 makes the most sense. It's a WAIVER CLAIM... it's not a new FA acquisition. If someone cuts a player for whatever reason, ALL TEAMS should have an equal right to make a claim on that person, regardless of their postseason status. The one-year rule is ONLY connected to FA pick ups, as playoff teams are the only teams allowed to bid on these players. I honestly don't know why this isn't a common sense rule. But we have our rules... so I'll try again this off season.