Quote:
Originally Posted by Liquid Swords
Cool. Just making sure I didn't overlook a rule update from the original.
I'm wondering if we should revisit the Franchise rules for next season. Franchising players should be difficult and costly IMO. One thought is to reduce the number of players to calculate from 10 to 5. Another thought is to prevent a team from franchising the same player in back-to-back years.
|
You're using top 10 to calculate Franchise tenders? I'm haven't been in SACD since the inaugral couple seasons, but I don't recall it being that deep to calculate Franchise values. Maybe it was, but looking at your numbers I would suggest no more than top 3 be used to calculate franchise tenders. Franchising a player should be paying top dollar.
Just my unsolicited 2 cents!