Re: Error discovered (late)!!!
I am certainly for being fair and do not want to cripple Jim. As Commish of SAC'd, I am just thinking of precedence. We certainly cannot begin to allow a pass anytime there is a mistake in the App - that is too much pressure on Pat, even though the dude is a stats genius.
So what is the criteria to allow this and not others, like Bobby's claim of Matthews for example. Is it solely based on the impact it would have on the team? Based on the timing of the season?
IT seems like the App did not have all cuts in there, based on Patrick's post, so it could be said the App was wrong at the time
I am simply trying to get a gauge on reasoning here, so that if this does ever happen again, we have some criteria to base a ruling on.
I would suggest that at the end of each season, if possible, Patrick posts a new App version, and EVERYONE is required to review and approve their team.
Same for the start of each new season. I like Chucks suggestion of a week down time to review everything after RFA declarations, to prepare for the bidding frenzy.
I also like Dale's suggestion in our texting back and forth (not sure if it was posted here) to update MFL, adding all RFA's at their tender bid. Then we have something to compare.
Anyways, just to be fair, what exactly is the criteria we are basing giving this mistake a pass, versus other times where App was not complete and a mistake was made?
__________________
What's the point in calling shots
His cue ain't straight in line
Cue balls made of Styrofoam
And no ones got the time
 OUT---
|