Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Skippy the One Eyed Beagle
2nd set of ties
Maplewood Mountain Lions 6-8, 2203.4, 29.2%, Lost H2H w/Disciples, Split H2H w/Bloodsuckers
Bay Area Bloodsuckers 6-8, 2389.4, 43.5%, Won H2H w/Mts Lions, Won H2H w/Disciples, Split H2H w/Mts Lions
Disciples of the 36 Chambers 6-8, 2510.75, 51.3%,Won H2H w/Mtn Lions, Lost H2H w/Bloodsuckers
|
Should read:
Maplewood Mountain Lions 6-8, 2203.4, 29.2%, Lost H2H w/Disciples, Split H2H w/Bloodsuckers
Bay Area Bloodsuckers 6-8, 2389.4, 43.5%,
<REMOVE>Won H2H w/Mts Lions,</REMOVE> Won H2H w/Disciples, Split H2H w/Mts Lions
Disciples of the 36 Chambers 6-8, 2510.75, 51.3%,Won H2H w/Mtn Lions, Lost H2H w/Bloodsuckers
Note: I still think my solution above is the most logical with H2H and Total Points as the tie breakers. You should compare each team to each of the others not all 3 against each other unless you have a loop (ie. Team A won H2H against Team B, Team B won H2H against Team C, and Team C won H2H against Team A....in which case you'd go to total points b/n the 3 teams)...we don't have a loop in our situation.