OK, well since no one has objected, here is the ruling from FBG. The 4-1 picks are, of course, still to be determined based on playoff outcome:
=================================================
This is kind of a bizarre set of circumstances. Since you have no rules in place and are asking me to pick a set arbitrarily, I am going to suggest you use the NFL’s rules. During the offseason, review our exhaustive article on ties:
http://apps.footballguys.com/04davies_kissing.cfm. (Burt's comment: I can look at this if you all want, and post this in another thread?)
This means that my ruling is the Eco Warriors draft before the Gunslingers by virtue of losing to them in the head-to-head.
The 6-8 ties are a little more complicated. With 3 or more teams, one team is selected as the winner and then you start over at the beginning. (In this case the team that drafts last of the three.) The head-to-head in a 3-way-tie must involve a sweep. That did not happen. The second tie breaker has to do with best record in the conference. You have one conference, do it doesn’t apply. The next few tie-breakers are pretty much NFL-league specific and do not apply. The following tiebreaker is best NET points. That is PF less PA. You have given me PF, but that’s it. If I had PA, I could probably render a decision.
Can you give me the complete standings and week-by-week results for your league?
================================================== ===
(Burt's comment: I then sent him a link to our Scores and Standings page)
Burt,
OK, here you go:
Official 2006 Draft Order
1 Eco Warriors (2-12; lost to GG)
2 Glenside Gulslinger (2-12; won over EW)
3 Falcon Floyds (5-9)
4 Maplewood Mountain Lions (6-8; lost to Disciples of the 36 hambers)
5 Disciples of the 26 Chambers (6-8; lost to Maplewood Mountain Lions)
6 Bay Area Bloodsuckers (6-8; most NET points of tied teams)
7 Jawbone Hill (7-7)
8 Buffalo Pitbulls (8-6)
9 Valencia Vibe (9-5)
10 Good Grief (10-4)
11 Subzero (11-3)
12 Chagrin Falls D.M.K.M. Snow (12-2)