[Doggler]

Instead of creating picks out of thin air, and instead of giving picks, why don't we SWAP picks? Basically, if you land someone else's RFA, you'll drop down a round and they'll move up a round.

The 'buying' team must give their highest pick at or above the tender level.
The 'selling' (or non-matching team) will give their highest pick from the round following the pick they receive.

Example
I have picks 1.9, 2.9, 3.9, 4.9, 5.9, 6.9
Burt has picks 1.3, 2.3, 3.3, 4.3, 5.3, 6.3
Burt has LT, he tenders him for a 1st.
I win LT.
Burt declines to match.
I give Burt 1.9 because he tendered him as a 1st round pick. Burt then gives me 2.3.

What I like about this system is that picks are NEVER devalued.
A few things would need to be ironed out:
1)Is a one-round swap fair enough to the team who decides not to match? We could turn it into a 2-round drop if that's the consensus.
2)What to do with multiple or no picks in a round? I think that can all be addressed...i.e. if you don't have a 1st and someone tenders a guy at a 1st, you simply cannot bid on him. Likewise, if you're Burt and you tender a guy for a 1st and you don't have a 2nd, you're screwed - maybe you swap 1sts if his is better than yours, but there is definately a hierarchy that can be followed.