Re: 2007 Rules Discussion - Weighted Lottery for the #1 pick
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mutts
Honestly, I think its horrible that we would have to "give" something to prevent cheating (which shouldn't exist in the first place)! A 4 team toilet bowl, with 11th and 12th place getting home field advantage, adds something to the league - the only reason I can get behind it.
|
Well I am strongly against any type of toilet bowl. Guess we'll just have to draw lines in the sand.
Why is expanding the playoffs such a bad thing? Are the "TOP" teams really that afraid of LOSING to the "BOTTOM" teams? How can adding more teams in the mix for the REAL LEAGUE trophy ever be a bad thing? So they scoot in at 8-8.... that means they have to win for 3 weeks straight to win the bowl game. You know what? They desrved every bit of that trophy then. You guys wants to award great managing, yet you prevent teams from competing in the main playoffs.
Basing draft picks on wins runs against the purpose of draft picks.
__________________
Bay Area Bloodsucking Insects
- 1st EVER Feeding Frenzy Champion
Bay Area Bloodsuckers
2008 SAC'D Champions
- 2nd Worst to First in Year!
2011 SAC'D Champions
- #5 seed, # 2 power rankings, #1 in the end!
Last edited by Flaxwless; December 7th, 2007 at 12:12 PM.
|