Quote:
The point is, if you used the comp points in an earlier rd from a tendered player, you move to the bottom of the pecking order for the remainder of the points on players already used.
It does make sense when you've already gotten a higher comp pick to not also be at the top of the order for the subsequent pick with those same points from a player you've already been compensated for in the higher round.
|
I guess what I am saying is that you beat me in the first round and then I am at a disadvantage in the subsequent round two assessment (even though we both lost two first rounder tendered players). It is not a big deal but I lose out to you in both rounds and then I also lose to the Floyds who lost a second and a third tender player as opposed to me losing two first rounder tender players.
I know there is not an easy way to do this but it still seems to me that I am getting squeezed here (and yes I know the difference in one or two slots is not huge but still seems off to me).