View Single Post
Old September 7th, 2008, 01:27 PM   #6
Flaxwless
Feeding Frenzy
 
Flaxwless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 6,050
Flaxwless is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Cap violation penalty ruling

Quote:
Originally Posted by Popes
Sorry to butt in and I'm not reading this issue as closely as the rest of you SACD guys, but isn't Frank's comparison apples to oranges because the "forgot to assign" crowd got an exception purely because you don't want to punish the new team owners that will have to take over this team next year? If they were long-term owners like you, they'd take the normal penalties - no exceptions. You can't harp all over the exception when making your comparison and have it be a valid comparison.
Exactly. I already have to lose a draft pick by being forced to cut a rookie.

Those guys will only face a cap penalty and MAYBE lose a draft pick if they are returning next year. It's BS.

The least I can do is at least have a choice of what draft pick I want to drop.

Hell I'd rather not cut any of my guys and face a cap penalty instead.
__________________
Bay Area Bloodsucking Insects
- 1st EVER Feeding Frenzy Champion

Bay Area Bloodsuckers

2008 SAC'D Champions
- 2nd Worst to First in Year!
2011 SAC'D Champions
- #5 seed, # 2 power rankings, #1 in the end!
Flaxwless is offline   Reply With Quote