Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmash33
I'm not against changes, but I feel we have a good amount of flexibility already. We only have to start 1 RB, 2 WR, and 1 TE with two flex spots...one is a RB/WR, the other is a WR/TE. In probably 90% of fantasy football leauges you have to start 2 RBs every week.
I would be against being able to start more RBs than WRs as that would be a big change in overall stradegy. If you look at the scoring, there are 9 RBs that avg over 20 ppg...no WR avg over 20 ppg. It would seem to give a bigger advantage to those that have multiple young RBs under contract for 3-4 yrs since prices for RBs in FA would go up.
Byes are always dicey with dynasty leagues. Sometimes you just have to deal with a bad week to avoid dropping people that could help you down the road. It's very rare that one week is going to decide a year, usually there are going to be bad breaks that happen many weeks that will cost you wins.
|
I agree I would be against EXPANDING rosters AND adding an RB FLEX SPOT.
I feel in SAC'D there's plenty of flexibility between the TS and large roster sizes.
My suggestion if we HAVE to make a change is to add 1 roster spot + 150 or 200 cbs + 1 year. Nothing else.