Quote:
Originally Posted by Flaxwless
Not that this matters much, since I agree we could increase the value of IDPs but as of the last Roster App for 2010 this is how teams have spent their cap space on IDPs:
1. Mutts (23.06%)
2. Geeks (18.46%)
3. Gunslingers (18.31%)
4. Tommy-Konckers (17.89%)
5. Floyds (15.79%)
6. Mashers (12.24%)
7. Scorpions (11.24%)
8. 36 Chambers (10.98%)
9. Greatshepski (10.56%)
10. Clowns (8.59%)
11. Hunters (7.17%)
12. Bloodsuckers (6.54%)
Looks like a classic bell curve to me.
|
Just for fun here is how it looks like based on difference between %rank and IDP total points scored:
1. Hunters +6 (11 spending/5th points)
2. 36 chambers + 4 (8/4)
X. Floyds +4 (5/1)
4. Knockers + 2 (4/2)
5. Bloodsuckers +1 (12/11)
6. Clowns 0 (10/10)
X. Mashers 0 (6/6)
8. Geeks -1 (2/3)
9. Scorpions -2 (7/9)
10. Shep - 3 (9/12)
11. Gunslingers - 4 (3/7)
12. Mutts -7 (1/8)
Looks like Hunters, 36 Chambers, and Floyds got good bang for their buck. Mutts, Gunslingers, and Shep overpaid their defenses. Everyone got roughly what they paid for in terms of team building strategy.