![]() |
|
|||||
| Feeding Frenzy League Sites |
| 2009 Feeding Frenzy |
| 2008 Feeding Frenzy |
| 2007 Feeding Frenzy |
| 2006 Feeding Frenzy |
| SAC'D League Sites |
| 2009 SAC'D |
| 2008 SAC'D |
| 2007 SAC'D |
| 2006 SAC'D |
| View Poll Results: IDP Scoring Change - after seeing stats results | |||
| Option 1 - lower scoring for IDP |
|
0 | 0% |
| Option 2 - Preds recommendation on page 2 (post # 30) of this thread |
|
1 | 9.09% |
| Option 3 - Preds alternate (post #35) - Int/Fum Return yards added |
|
10 | 90.91% |
| Voters: 11. This poll is closed | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Frenzy and SAC'D
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 17,307
![]() |
http://football.myfantasyleague.com/...s?L=25465&O=37
The above link will take you to the scoring for the IDP league I played in last season. When looking at DBs, select CB+S and when looking at DLs, select DT+DE. LBs are just LBs. Scoring for above league: Punt/Kickoff Return TDs: 6pts Fumble Recovery/Interception Return TDs: 6pts Blocked FG/Punt Return TDs: 6pts Fumble Recoveries: 4pts Interceptions Caught: 4pts Blocked FG/Punt: 4pts Tackles: 1pt Assists: 0.5pt QB Sack: 4pts Safeties: 6pts
__________________
5 time Frenzy Champion - 2024, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016 - Liquid Swords ![]() 5 time SAC'D Champion - 2024, co-2022, 2021, 2019, 2010 - Disciples of the 36 Chambers
Last edited by Preds; April 17th, 2005 at 09:54 PM. |
|
|
|
| Liquid Swords |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Liquid Swords |
|
|
#2 |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Moderator Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Maplewood, MN
Posts: 5,204
![]() |
So, scoring wise, it seems the best player at each D position scores about as much as the better TEs (based on Frenzy scoring). Would you say that is accurate?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Frenzy and SAC'D
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 17,307
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
5 time Frenzy Champion - 2024, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016 - Liquid Swords ![]() 5 time SAC'D Champion - 2024, co-2022, 2021, 2019, 2010 - Disciples of the 36 Chambers
|
|
|
|
|
| Liquid Swords |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Liquid Swords |
|
|
#4 |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Moderator Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Maplewood, MN
Posts: 5,204
![]() |
So if I'm reading the charts right, as far as LBs, we are going to have the best averaging around 10 points, and bums on the bench averaging in the 3 range, and a straight line decline down in scoring. I can live with that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
*****istrator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hamburg, NY
Posts: 17,782
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
SAC'D
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Outside Philadelphia
Posts: 1,183
![]() |
I like it. What about the blocked passes? That came up in the other thread.
|
|
|
|
| randilover |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by randilover |
|
|
#7 |
|
Frenzy and SAC'D
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 17,307
![]() |
you can increase the scoring quite a bit by bumping up tackles to 2 pts and assists to 1 point.....that was the original scoring but two years ago it was bumped down to 1/.5
__________________
5 time Frenzy Champion - 2024, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016 - Liquid Swords ![]() 5 time SAC'D Champion - 2024, co-2022, 2021, 2019, 2010 - Disciples of the 36 Chambers
|
|
|
|
| Liquid Swords |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Liquid Swords |
|
|
#8 | |
|
*****istrator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hamburg, NY
Posts: 17,782
![]() |
Quote:
It makes a huge difference (probably a good one) since your solid tacklers really rise to the top. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Frenzy and SAC'D
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 17,307
![]() |
Quote:
Edit: actually, I think it was Urlacher that put up the big numbers....i think Ray was out quite a bit that year.
__________________
5 time Frenzy Champion - 2024, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016 - Liquid Swords ![]() 5 time SAC'D Champion - 2024, co-2022, 2021, 2019, 2010 - Disciples of the 36 Chambers
Last edited by Liquid Swords; April 14th, 2005 at 05:22 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| Liquid Swords |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Liquid Swords |
|
|
#10 |
|
SAC'D
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 465
![]() |
My thoughts are to raise tackle pts as these are more predictable and a better indication of the quality of the player and lower the pts for fumble recoveries and INTs slightly as these are wildly unpredictable. Something like:
Fumble Recovery/Interception Return TDs: 6pts Blocked FG/Punt Return TDs: 6pts Fumble Recoveries: 3pts Interceptions Caught: 3pts Blocked FG/Punt: 4pts Tackles: 1.5pts Assists: .5 pt QB Sack: 2pts per .5 sacks ... often get 1/2 a sack Safeties: 6pts Forced Fumbles: 3pts ... added this in Deflected passes: 1pt ... added this in |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
*****istrator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hamburg, NY
Posts: 17,782
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Supreme FF Dominator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Falcon, Colorado
Posts: 19,481
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Burt the Butcher |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Burt the Butcher |
|
|
#13 | |
|
General Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bloomington, Indiana
Posts: 3,026
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
SAC'D
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 465
![]() |
I agree 2/2 for fumbles is good.
Raising deflected pass pts may also be a good idea as this will get DTs a little more in line with LBs and DBs which look to be higher scoring positions at the moment. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
*****istrator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hamburg, NY
Posts: 17,782
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Moderator Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Maplewood, MN
Posts: 5,204
![]() |
All of these ideas sound good to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
NF-FFL, CDL, & SAC'D
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lancaster, California
Posts: 1,035
![]() |
What they said... :thumbsup
I like all the improvements |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Skippy the One Eyed Beagle
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
sounds pretty good.
would anyone *cough*preds*cough* be able to run this through FLM and post what the results of the changes would be? |
|
| Skippy the One Eyed Beagle |
|
|
#19 |
|
PredsFF.com Portal News Reporters
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,210
![]() |
do you really want defected passes to be more important than tackles and equal to sacks? Besides, DL are not the only ones getting them. A lot of DBs get defects, so that will increase their scores. Main points for DL are sacks from my experience.
I like adding the deflected, just don't want to score it too high. We can try 2 points, then re-evaluate next year. I also like having 2/2 for forced fumbles and fumble recoveries. |
|
|
|
| The Immortal Ramirez |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by The Immortal Ramirez |
|
|
#20 | |
|
*****istrator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hamburg, NY
Posts: 17,782
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Passed: Scoring: Make last years scoring permanent? | Nittany Dodgers | Frenzy Rules & Bylaws | 1 | April 9th, 2003 11:44 PM |


