September 21st, 2015, 04:51 PM | #1 |
Supreme FF Dominator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Falcon, Colorado
Posts: 17,945
|
Possible 2016 scoring change
So, unless I score 10 points tonight, my team will lose for 2nd straight week to the high scoring team, with the 3rd highest score. I will have 2nd overall high total points, but be 0-2
I was talking to someone in another league, where they give you two points each week. One for a win, and 1 to each of the 6 highest scores. This would bring to the top the concomitantly better teams, who just run into some bad luck. Thoughts? I know we have all been there, losing with 2nd high score....
__________________
What's the point in calling shots His cue ain't straight in line Cue balls made of Styrofoam And no ones got the time OUT--- |
January 7th, 2016, 01:52 PM | #2 |
SAC'D
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,615
|
Re: Possible 2016 scoring change
I missed this when it was originally posted. Have you reconsidered with time?
I don't like this. This sort of defeats the purpose of the roto style. If you want to make the best scoring teams get a bonus why do a roto style? This is part of the inherent beauty and frustration of fantasy football. We've probably all played in leagues where we've scored high and still not finished well. Over a few years probability is well in everyone's favor to be on both ends of this sort of short term good/bad luck. Just my 2 cents. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2016 Rookie Picks traded | Burt the Butcher | SAC'D Trading Block | 0 | June 16th, 2015 12:10 PM |
Defense scoring question | emerald | Frenzy Rules & Bylaws | 11 | May 2nd, 2012 10:44 PM |
Sample IDP Scoring (See Links in Post #30 to see sample of Proposed Scoring Systems) | Liquid Swords | SAC'D Rules & Bylaws | 64 | April 19th, 2005 10:35 AM |
Passed: Scoring: Make last years scoring permanent? | Nittany Dodgers | Frenzy Rules & Bylaws | 1 | April 9th, 2003 11:44 PM |