ROSTER VIOLATION? DT San Diego Chargers - SOLD for 100 to the Predators (2yrs)

Preds · December 9th, 2005, 07:39 AM

100

2yrs, cut Cleveland DT if I win

ETA - max available years was 1, 2 would be exceeding the cap limit

Preds · December 23rd, 2005, 09:00 AM

Guys,

I was updating my own team page while preparing to make some moves for my bowl matchup against Brian, and when I input the moves, it appears I went over the contract years limit by one year by trying to give the Chargers D 2 years.

I only used the Chargers D once (wk14) and it doesn't make a difference in the standings for that week.

The question I have, is what penalty (if any) is applied? Is it a Roster Violation with the Chargers D cut and the 20% cap hit assessed? Or is it just dropped to a 1 year deal?

This is a decision for the board to decide.

Again, fortunately it has no impact on the games.

Nittany Dodgers · December 23rd, 2005, 10:45 AM

I believe technically, it would be a roster violation since you went over the contract year cap, but I don't know if this has happened before and we just reduced the contract to one year, which would set a precedent. I have no strong feelings.

Preds · December 23rd, 2005, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nittany Dodgers

I believe technically, it would be a roster violation since you went over the contract year cap, but I don't know if this has happened before and we just reduced the contract to one year, which would set a precedent. I have no strong feelings.

For the record, I'm fine with whatever decision the board decides.

Royal Hawaiian Opihi · December 23rd, 2005, 04:08 PM

I'm in favor of automatically reducing to one year... for this and any future incidents. It's very different from exceeding the salary cap, which requires roster adjustments. Now, if they didn't even have ONE year available, then I'd say we need to apply the cap penalty, too.

(Are you sure you didn't use them against me last week, Mike?)

Preds · December 23rd, 2005, 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Royal Hawaiian Opihi

I'm in favor of automatically reducing to one year... for this and any future incidents. It's very different from exceeding the salary cap, which requires roster adjustments. Now, if they didn't even have ONE year available, then I'd say we need to apply the cap penalty, too.

(Are you sure you didn't use them against me last week, Mike?)

, no last week I started Baltimore D and all 24 of their points against you!

I did start San Diego week 14 (the week I picked them up), and they scored 4 points, but I won by 32+ points that week.

December 9th, 2005, 07:39 AM	#1
Preds *****istrator Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Hamburg, NY Posts: 17,782	ROSTER VIOLATION? DT San Diego Chargers - SOLD for 100 to the Predators (2yrs) 100 2yrs, cut Cleveland DT if I win ETA - max available years was 1, 2 would be exceeding the cap limit __________________ *4x Frenzy Champions (2003, 2005, 2013, 2022) with 9 appearances in the Frenzy Bowl (4 in the past 5 seasons*) 2022 Co-Champions with WchMeGo Roosters Email: preds1@gmail.com Cell: 716-481-8823 Last edited by Preds; December 23rd, 2005 at 09:01 AM.

December 23rd, 2005, 09:00 AM	#2
Preds *****istrator Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Hamburg, NY Posts: 17,782	Re: DT San Diego Chargers - SOLD for 100 to the Predators (2yrs) Guys, I was updating my own team page while preparing to make some moves for my bowl matchup against Brian, and when I input the moves, it appears I went over the contract years limit by one year by trying to give the Chargers D 2 years. I only used the Chargers D once (wk14) and it doesn't make a difference in the standings for that week. The question I have, is what penalty (if any) is applied? Is it a Roster Violation with the Chargers D cut and the 20% cap hit assessed? Or is it just dropped to a 1 year deal? This is a decision for the board to decide. Again, fortunately it has no impact on the games. __________________ *4x Frenzy Champions (2003, 2005, 2013, 2022) with 9 appearances in the Frenzy Bowl (4 in the past 5 seasons*) 2022 Co-Champions with WchMeGo Roosters Email: preds1@gmail.com Cell: 716-481-8823

December 23rd, 2005, 10:45 AM	#3
Nittany Dodgers Feeding Frenzy Moderator Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Maplewood, MN Posts: 5,204	Re: ROSTER VIOLATION? DT San Diego Chargers - SOLD for 100 to the Predators (2yrs) I believe technically, it would be a roster violation since you went over the contract year cap, but I don't know if this has happened before and we just reduced the contract to one year, which would set a precedent. I have no strong feelings.

December 23rd, 2005, 04:08 PM	#5
Royal Hawaiian Opihi Feeding Frenzy Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Palmdale, CA Posts: 16,604	Re: ROSTER VIOLATION? DT San Diego Chargers - SOLD for 100 to the Predators (2yrs) I'm in favor of automatically reducing to one year... for this and any future incidents. It's very different from exceeding the salary cap, which requires roster adjustments. Now, if they didn't even have ONE year available, then I'd say we need to apply the cap penalty, too. (Are you sure you didn't use them against me last week, Mike?)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
D/ST San Diego Chargers - SOLD for 100 to the Predators	Preds	Frenzy Free Agency & the Waiver Wire	2	June 28th, 2005 10:00 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)