![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,270
![]() |
How are we going to handle all of the rookie picks that are likely to be cut in August. It seems like there are too many players for too few slots so with those that are not kept do they pass through the waiver system?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Moderator Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Maplewood, MN
Posts: 5,204
![]() |
I would think if they are not assigned contract years, and not places on an active roster, TS, or PS, they would not be ellibile for waivers, since they never had a contract. That's just my opinion though, as this was not contemplated in the rule crafting. Good question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Frenzy and SAC'D
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 17,307
![]() |
good ?
never thought about it, but my guess is that they wouldn't be eligible for waivers but would instead just be thrown into the UFA market. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
*****istrator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hamburg, NY
Posts: 17,782
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,270
![]() |
Just wanted to make sure. This means that we are going to likely have about 25-30 rookies cut that will no longer be DS eligible. Is it too late to think about increasing the size of the taxi/developmental squad?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Moderator Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Maplewood, MN
Posts: 5,204
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
*****istrator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hamburg, NY
Posts: 17,782
![]() |
Quote:
Teams need to decide who to move up active, who gets the Taxi spots, who get the new Practice Squad slot, and who gets cut each year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Palmdale, CA
Posts: 16,604
![]() |
I agree... leave it as is. We knew going into the draft that we'd only have a certain amount of spaces. The cut rooks become UFAs immediately. End of story.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 6,050
![]() |
Agreed. Keep it as is.
That's why I drafted the way I did, trading away certain picks or not asking for more in return. If you can't move up players after a year or two on DS... it's time to reconsider their worth.
__________________
Bay Area Bloodsucking Insects - 1st EVER Feeding Frenzy Champion Bay Area Bloodsuckers 2008 SAC'D Champions - 2nd Worst to First in Year! 2011 SAC'D Champions - #5 seed, # 2 power rankings, #1 in the end! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ypsilanti, MI
Posts: 840
![]() |
Agreed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,815
![]() |
I also agree, we should keep it the same
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|