IDP Rookie cap hit and bonus structure - Page 5

Nittany Dodgers · April 21st, 2005, 12:59 PM

But I have few more issues I want to argue about first...

Philadelphia Freedom · April 21st, 2005, 01:00 PM

Quote:

My vote is currently one of the ones against it.

I will swing it over to wrap things up.

Much obliged!! Now it is on to determining the order...

randilover · April 21st, 2005, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skippy the One Eyed Beagle

My vote is currently one of the ones against it.

I will swing it over to wrap things up.

Yahoo... :thumbsup

Preds · April 21st, 2005, 01:11 PM

Valencia has voted, and he's voted to keep the rooks in the auction with the Vets.

Mutts and Insects haven't voted, and you've bribed Keepers to switch. I will not change my vote on this. I totally HATE the concept of what you guys are shoving down our throats here, and you can bet I'll bitch about it for YEARS to come ;).

All that being said, I'm likely to lose on this with the Kerry loving liberals flip flopping their votes. In light of that, how about some CREATIVE (that's for you Brian) thinking on the draft order. Using a random generator to decide the order of selection of the DRAFT slots. Still use either Brian's or Matt's overall 1-12 12-1 12-1 whatever orderering, but allows teams to pick their draft slot based on an order of picking generated randomly. Kind of a mini-draft of the draft slots.

Again, despite my creative idea above, I'll continue being on the record against what you're shoving mercilessly down my throat! :furious

Nittany Dodgers · April 21st, 2005, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Preds

Valencia has voted, and he's voted to keep the rooks in the auction with the Vets.

Mutts and Insects haven't voted, and you've bribed Keepers to switch. I will not change my vote on this. I totally HATE the concept of what you guys are shoving down our throats here, and you can bet I'll bitch about it for YEARS to come ;).

All that being said, I'm likely to lose on this with the Kerry loving liberals flip flopping their votes. In light of that, how about some CREATIVE (that's for you Brian) thinking on the draft order. Using a random generator to decide the order of selection of the DRAFT slots. Still use either Brian's or Matt's overall 1-12 12-1 12-1 whatever orderering, but allows teams to pick their draft slot based on an order of picking generated randomly. Kind of a mini-draft of the draft slots.

Again, despite my creative idea above, I'll continue being on the record against what you're shoving mercilessly down my throat! :furious

I had thought of that as well, but I thought it was too convoluted. If it will appease some on the other side of the fence, I have no problem with it. It is still random, and it only increases each teams opportunity to get into a position they like. I have no problems with it. I also have no problem with calling the idea creative, since I agree with it.

Mike, it looks like we are going to finish the week 1-1 on things we strongly disagree on.

Preds · April 21st, 2005, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nittany Dodgers

I had thought of that as well, but I thought it was too convoluted. If it will appease some on the other side of the fence, I have no problem with it. It is still random, and it only increases each teams opportunity to get into a position they like. I have no problems with it. I also have no problem with calling the idea creative, since I agree with it.

Mike, it looks like we are going to finish the week 1-1 on things we strongly disagree on.

You sure it's not 1-0-1... I think the Barlow situation is more of a draw.

By the way, I thought the Kerry flip flop line would generate a few chuckles and comments.... guess not!

April 21st, 2005, 01:16 PM

I like the idea of picking draft slots also.

randilover · April 21st, 2005, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Preds

Again, despite my creative idea above, I'll continue being on the record against what you're shoving mercilessly down my throat!

I like your idea. I'm down...

Burt the Butcher · April 21st, 2005, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Preds

Again, despite my creative idea above, I'll continue being on the record against what you're shoving mercilessly down my throat! :furious

The beauty of democracy ;-)

I am in a dynasty league that had a random drawing, and then allowed the owners in that drawn order to pick the position they wanted to draft in. That worked well, and I would agree to that.

The Immortal Ramirez · April 21st, 2005, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by paulsonpatch

I am in a dynasty league that had a random drawing, and then allowed the owners in that drawn order to pick the position they wanted to draft in. That worked well, and I would agree to that.

I could go for that...of course, if people are truly legalistic, then I get the 12th pick...

Philadelphia Freedom · April 21st, 2005, 01:46 PM

Quote:

I could go for that...of course, if people are truly legalistic, then I get the 12th pick...

Legalistic people suck!! GB, pop-punkseters MxPx...

I am cool with picking an order and then letting people pick their pick. In this case Keepers gets my number if it is higher than his.

The Immortal Ramirez · April 21st, 2005, 01:48 PM

so, who's going to run the random generator?

The Immortal Ramirez · April 21st, 2005, 01:50 PM

Mike (Preds), should we eliminate this poll then and put a new one?
Draft: 1-12, 12-1, 12-1, 12-1, etc OR 1-12, 12-1, 12-1, 1-12, 12-1, etc?

Philadelphia Freedom · April 21st, 2005, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Draft: 1-12, 12-1, 12-1, 12-1, etc OR 1-12, 12-1, 12-1, 1-12, 12-1

I don't care but if we need to vote I will go with the majority on this one. Also, at some point we need to have names so we can put the draft list together (either that or it will just default to our screen name).

Preds · April 21st, 2005, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Immortal Ramirez

Mike (Preds), should we eliminate this poll then and put a new one?
Draft: 1-12, 12-1, 12-1, 12-1, etc OR 1-12, 12-1, 12-1, 1-12, 12-1, etc?

Don't ask me.. not my show here... I'm just gonna go with the flow and try to swim back upstream on another outlet ;).

Preds · April 21st, 2005, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Immortal Ramirez

so, who's going to run the random generator?

I have a fantasy site that will randomly assign orders. Everybody gets emailed at the same time.

All I need is an email address for everyone.

FYI... I still am AGAINST this concept.... I'll remind you f'ers of that every few posts!

The Immortal Ramirez · April 21st, 2005, 01:58 PM

K. Just don't pee on that outlet!

Creating new thread for discussion on draft....

I would also just recommend to put the owner names in the generator...it make take a while for some people to get team names...

The Immortal Ramirez · April 21st, 2005, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Preds

I'll remind you f'ers of that every few posts!

we have no doubt on this.

Nittany Dodgers · April 21st, 2005, 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Preds

You sure it's not 1-0-1... I think the Barlow situation is more of a draw.

By the way, I thought the Kerry flip flop line would generate a few chuckles and comments.... guess not!

How is Barlow a draw? Unless something changes, things are status quo, meaning you get to keep circumventing the rules.

Just be happy your random order for pick selection met a receptive audience, so stop complaining.

Preds · April 21st, 2005, 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nittany Dodgers

How is Barlow a draw? Unless something changes, things are status quo, meaning you get to keep circumventing the rules.

Just be happy your random order for pick selection met a receptive audience, so stop complaining.

Maybe you should do a better job writing FLAWED rules ;)

Nittany Dodgers · April 21st, 2005, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Preds

Maybe you should do a better job writing FLAWED rules ;)

I CANNOT TAKE THIS CONSTANT CRITICISM! I'M OUT! :furious

Preds · April 21st, 2005, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nittany Dodgers

Just be happy your random order for pick selection met a receptive audience, so stop complaining.

Just to make sure no accusations are later made... here's a link to the randomizer sight.

It's great for determining fantasy draft orders. http://www.profantasysports.com/DraftRandomizer.htm

Preds · April 21st, 2005, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nittany Dodgers

I CANNOT TAKE THIS CONSTANT CRITICISM! I'M OUT! :furious

Nittany Dodgers · April 21st, 2005, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Preds

Just to make sure no accusations are later made... here's a link to the randomizer sight.

It's great for determining fantasy draft orders. http://www.profantasysports.com/DraftRandomizer.htm

Dang you. I already had my accusatory post drafted.

Burt the Butcher · April 21st, 2005, 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Preds

FYI... I still am AGAINST this concept.... I'll remind you f'ers of that every few posts!

For the record: I am AGAINST Mike posting anymore messages stating how AGAINST this proposal he is...

Nittany Dodgers · April 21st, 2005, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by paulsonpatch

For the record: I am AGAINST Mike posting anymore messages stating how AGAINST this proposal he is...

I'll second that.

Preds · April 21st, 2005, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by paulsonpatch

For the record: I am AGAINST Mike posting anymore messages stating how AGAINST this proposal he is...

I'd be wary of baring your ass around some of the "switch hitters" around here.

Burt the Butcher · April 21st, 2005, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Preds

I'd be wary of baring your ass around some of the "switch hitters" around here.

Nice

Liquid Swords · April 21st, 2005, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Preds

Again, despite my creative idea above, I'll continue being on the record against what you're shoving mercilessly down my throat! :furious

D-I- Double T -O

Liquid Swords · April 21st, 2005, 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Preds

You sure it's not 1-0-1... I think the Barlow situation is more of a draw.

By the way, I thought the Kerry flip flop line would generate a few chuckles and comments.... guess not!

It does to me...damn liberal flip-floppin' wearin' and votin' hippies

April 21st, 2005, 12:59 PM	#121
Nittany Dodgers Feeding Frenzy Moderator Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Maplewood, MN Posts: 5,204	Re: IDP Rookie cap hit and bonus structure But I have few more issues I want to argue about first...

April 21st, 2005, 01:11 PM	#124
Preds *****istrator Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Hamburg, NY Posts: 17,782	Re: IDP Rookie cap hit and bonus structure Valencia has voted, and he's voted to keep the rooks in the auction with the Vets. Mutts and Insects haven't voted, and you've bribed Keepers to switch. I will not change my vote on this. I totally HATE the concept of what you guys are shoving down our throats here, and you can bet I'll bitch about it for YEARS to come ;). All that being said, I'm likely to lose on this with the Kerry loving liberals flip flopping their votes. In light of that, how about some CREATIVE (that's for you Brian) thinking on the draft order. Using a random generator to decide the order of selection of the DRAFT slots. Still use either Brian's or Matt's overall 1-12 12-1 12-1 whatever orderering, but allows teams to pick their draft slot based on an order of picking generated randomly. Kind of a mini-draft of the draft slots. Again, despite my creative idea above, I'll continue being on the record against what you're shoving mercilessly down my throat! :furious

April 21st, 2005, 01:16 PM	#127
Skippy the One Eyed Beagle Guest Posts: n/a	Re: IDP Rookie cap hit and bonus structure I like the idea of picking draft slots also.

April 21st, 2005, 01:48 PM	#132
The Immortal Ramirez PredsFF.com Portal News Reporters Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 1,210	Re: IDP Rookie cap hit and bonus structure so, who's going to run the random generator?

April 21st, 2005, 01:50 PM	#133
The Immortal Ramirez PredsFF.com Portal News Reporters Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 1,210	Re: IDP Rookie cap hit and bonus structure Mike (Preds), should we eliminate this poll then and put a new one? Draft: 1-12, 12-1, 12-1, 12-1, etc OR 1-12, 12-1, 12-1, 1-12, 12-1, etc?

April 21st, 2005, 01:58 PM	#137
The Immortal Ramirez PredsFF.com Portal News Reporters Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 1,210	Re: IDP Rookie cap hit and bonus structure K. Just don't pee on that outlet! Creating new thread for discussion on draft.... I would also just recommend to put the owner names in the generator...it make take a while for some people to get team names...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Rookie Draft Rules & Salary Scale	Preds	Frenzy Rookie Draft	14	April 26th, 2006 03:51 AM
Roster App and Draft Tracker overhauled to reflect all the Rule changes	Preds	Frenzy League Chat	13	March 8th, 2004 12:21 PM
Offseason Rules Discussion - Multiple Year Contracts - Signing Bonus Cap Hits	Brain Dead Squirrel Chasers	Frenzy Rules & Bylaws	14	March 3rd, 2004 09:05 AM