2006 SACD RFA Commentary - Page 2

Nittany Dodgers · April 3rd, 2006, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Preds

Fricken grammar police... get a life ;)

Maybe I should start calling you SMOO.

Hmm, that was an unintentional grammar attack. Yet looking closer, it appeared warranted.

Wow, I haven't been to the FBG boards for months. Smoo is a name I have not heard in a long time....a long time.

Preds · April 3rd, 2006, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nittany Dodgers

Hmm, that was an unintentional grammar attack. Yet looking closer, it appeared warranted.

Wow, I haven't been to the FBG boards for months. Smoo is a name I have not heard in a long time....a long time.

Aren't you lucky... he's one of the WW geeks on packmentality

Doggler · April 3rd, 2006, 05:46 PM

Ahhhh, Smoo. Not sure if I miss him or not.

Nittany Dodgers · April 6th, 2006, 11:58 AM

I thought the consensus was that RB prices were going to fall? So much for that theory.

Doggler · April 6th, 2006, 12:21 PM

Yes, the 6-man game of musical-stud-RBs is getting expensive.

Burt the Butcher · April 6th, 2006, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nittany Dodgers

I thought the consensus was that RB prices were going to fall? So much for that theory.

Preds started it....5250!! bah...

Preds · April 6th, 2006, 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burt the Butcher

Preds started it....5250!! bah...

:Shrug:Sorry

Liquid Swords · April 6th, 2006, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nittany Dodgers

I thought the consensus was that RB prices were going to fall? So much for that theory.

No kidding.

Flaxwless · April 6th, 2006, 02:43 PM

DOnt think stud RB prices will drop anytime soon

Burt the Butcher · April 6th, 2006, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flaxwless

DOnt think stud RB prices will drop anytime soon

I have a feeling they won't EVER drop...better get lucky with the rookie draft.....

Nittany Dodgers · April 7th, 2006, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burt the Butcher

I have a feeling they won't EVER drop...better get lucky with the rookie draft.....

Well, then the RFA tenders are too low. Seven RFAs have been sold and the match has been determined. Of those seven, 3 1st round compensatory picks have been handed out. That's not a good way to start things with so many more RFAs to be bid on. Potentially, three more (or more, I've lost track) could be handed out. That would be yucky.

Doggler · April 7th, 2006, 04:12 PM

Especially if you have pick 2.1

April 7th, 2006, 04:13 PM

1 year is not a trend.

I would hate to make a correction for something that is not broken.

Nittany Dodgers · April 7th, 2006, 04:27 PM

True, I'm not saying we change for next year, but if next year is a repeat, then I would advocate adjusting the numbers.

Flaxwless · April 7th, 2006, 06:37 PM

So I get Rudi Burt?

Burt the Butcher · April 7th, 2006, 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flaxwless

So I get Rudi Burt?

I have 2 days to decide....but ultimatly, it's Skippy's call, not mine....:bling

Burt the Butcher · April 7th, 2006, 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nittany Dodgers

True, I'm not saying we change for next year, but if next year is a repeat, then I would advocate adjusting the numbers.

I have a feeling once more teams get some low priced draft picks in the fold, prices will start to get more affordable...other than LT and SA types....

April 8th, 2006, 11:09 AM

when do we have to decide how many years to slap on to players we got in RFA?

Nittany Dodgers · April 8th, 2006, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skippy the One Eyed Beagle

when do we have to decide how many years to slap on to players we got in RFA?

All players acquired through RFA, the rookie draft, and over the summer don't need years assigned until the start of the season UNLESS they are traded, at which point years need to be assigned prior to the trade.

Burt the Butcher · April 8th, 2006, 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nittany Dodgers

All players acquired through RFA, the rookie draft, and over the summer don't need years assigned until the start of the season UNLESS they are traded, at which point years need to be assigned prior to the trade.

I thought RFA's couldn't be traded until Aug 31?

Nittany Dodgers · April 8th, 2006, 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burt the Butcher

I thought RFA's couldn't be traded until Aug 31?

I was refering to rookies and UFA regarding the trades.

Burt the Butcher · April 8th, 2006, 03:57 PM

But Skippy was referring to RFA's...

Nittany Dodgers · April 8th, 2006, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burt the Butcher

But Skippy was referring to RFA's...

I meant I was refering to rookies and UFA when I mentioned "UNLESS they are traded." Obviously (or, it should be obvious) since RFAs cannot be traded, that part of my statement does not apply.

Burt the Butcher · April 8th, 2006, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nittany Dodgers

I meant I was refering to rookies and UFA when I mentioned "UNLESS they are traded." Obviously (or, it should be obvious) since RFAs cannot be traded, that part of my statement does not apply.

Huh?

opcorn

Nittany Dodgers · April 8th, 2006, 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burt the Butcher

Huh?

opcorn

Deadline to announce contract years:

RFAs = Start of season

UFA = Start of season (unless traded, then years must be announced at time of trade)

Rookies = Start of season (unless traded, then years must be announced at time of trade).

Capiche?

Burt the Butcher · April 8th, 2006, 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nittany Dodgers

Deadline to announce contract years:

RFAs = Start of season

UFA = Start of season (unless traded, then years must be announced at time of trade)

Rookies = Start of season (unless traded, then years must be announced at time of trade).

Capiche?

Dude. I understood what you were saying....I ws just wondering where Skippy stood on all this....

April 9th, 2006, 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burt the Butcher

Dude. I understood what you were saying....I ws just wondering where Skippy stood on all this....

where i stand? i think dodgers has it right.

Philadelphia Freedom · April 10th, 2006, 08:08 AM

Man, after jacking all the RFA amounts up I was hoping to avoid all these compensatory picks. I really think we ought to consider some fee for the team that gets the player (ie you sign a first round tender guy and it costs you a third round pick). I am not saying an eye for an eye but otherwise we end up with like an extra rounds worth of compensatory picks.

This is not a huge issue for third or fourth round compensatory picks but the first rounders kill the value of second round picks. I think this is something that we should consider adding for next offseason.

Preds · April 10th, 2006, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Philadelphia Freedom

Man, after jacking all the RFA amounts up I was hoping to avoid all these compensatory picks. I really think we ought to consider some fee for the team that gets the player (ie you sign a first round tender guy and it costs you a third round pick). I am not saying an eye for an eye but otherwise we end up with like an extra rounds worth of compensatory picks.

This is not a huge issue for third or fourth round compensatory picks but the first rounders kill the value of second round picks. I think this is something that we should consider adding for next offseason.

My take, I think the RB tenders need to be bumped to 4000 for a 1st, the tenders for rounds 2-6 are fine.

If the RB tender was 4000 for a 1st I never woulda tendered a 1st for McGahee, though as it was I felt I was really gambling at 3200.

I'd also be in favor of eliminating a 1st round tender level for all IDP's, Ray Lewis, as good as he once was, doesn't warrant a 1st round comp IMO.

Lets just fix some of the 1st round tenders, specifiacally RB by making it an extremely difficult decision to tender a 1st, unless you've got a LT or Alexander type.

Doggler · April 10th, 2006, 09:28 AM

Grrr, agreeing with Mike hurts.

April 3rd, 2006, 05:46 PM	#33
Doggler SAC'D Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Colorado Springs Posts: 964	Re: 2006 SACD RFA Commentary Ahhhh, Smoo. Not sure if I miss him or not. __________________ Red Rocks Pea Cocks

April 6th, 2006, 11:58 AM	#34
Nittany Dodgers Feeding Frenzy Moderator Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Maplewood, MN Posts: 5,204	Re: 2006 SACD RFA Commentary I thought the consensus was that RB prices were going to fall? So much for that theory.

April 6th, 2006, 12:21 PM	#35
Doggler SAC'D Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Colorado Springs Posts: 964	Re: 2006 SACD RFA Commentary Yes, the 6-man game of musical-stud-RBs is getting expensive. __________________ Red Rocks Pea Cocks

April 6th, 2006, 02:43 PM	#39
Flaxwless Feeding Frenzy Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Bay Area, California Posts: 6,050	Re: 2006 SACD RFA Commentary DOnt think stud RB prices will drop anytime soon __________________ Bay Area Bloodsucking Insects - 1st EVER Feeding Frenzy Champion Bay Area Bloodsuckers 2008 SAC'D Champions - 2nd Worst to First in Year! 2011 SAC'D Champions - #5 seed, # 2 power rankings, #1 in the end!

April 7th, 2006, 04:12 PM	#42
Doggler SAC'D Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Colorado Springs Posts: 964	Re: 2006 SACD RFA Commentary Especially if you have pick 2.1 __________________ Red Rocks Pea Cocks

April 7th, 2006, 04:13 PM	#43
Skippy the One Eyed Beagle Guest Posts: n/a	Re: 2006 SACD RFA Commentary 1 year is not a trend. I would hate to make a correction for something that is not broken.

April 7th, 2006, 04:27 PM	#44
Nittany Dodgers Feeding Frenzy Moderator Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Maplewood, MN Posts: 5,204	Re: 2006 SACD RFA Commentary True, I'm not saying we change for next year, but if next year is a repeat, then I would advocate adjusting the numbers.

April 7th, 2006, 06:37 PM	#45
Flaxwless Feeding Frenzy Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Bay Area, California Posts: 6,050	Re: 2006 SACD RFA Commentary So I get Rudi Burt? __________________ Bay Area Bloodsucking Insects - 1st EVER Feeding Frenzy Champion Bay Area Bloodsuckers 2008 SAC'D Champions - 2nd Worst to First in Year! 2011 SAC'D Champions - #5 seed, # 2 power rankings, #1 in the end!

April 8th, 2006, 11:09 AM	#48
Skippy the One Eyed Beagle Guest Posts: n/a	Re: 2006 SACD RFA Commentary when do we have to decide how many years to slap on to players we got in RFA?

April 8th, 2006, 03:57 PM	#52
Burt the Butcher Supreme FF Dominator Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Falcon, Colorado Posts: 19,481	Re: 2006 SACD RFA Commentary But Skippy was referring to RFA's... __________________ What's the point in calling shots His cue ain't straight in line Cue balls made of Styrofoam And no ones got the time OUT---

April 10th, 2006, 08:08 AM	#58
Philadelphia Freedom Feeding Frenzy Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Posts: 6,270	Re: 2006 SACD RFA Commentary Man, after jacking all the RFA amounts up I was hoping to avoid all these compensatory picks. I really think we ought to consider some fee for the team that gets the player (ie you sign a first round tender guy and it costs you a third round pick). I am not saying an eye for an eye but otherwise we end up with like an extra rounds worth of compensatory picks. This is not a huge issue for third or fourth round compensatory picks but the first rounders kill the value of second round picks. I think this is something that we should consider adding for next offseason.

April 10th, 2006, 09:28 AM	#60
Doggler SAC'D Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Colorado Springs Posts: 964	Re: 2006 SACD RFA Commentary Grrr, agreeing with Mike hurts. __________________ Red Rocks Pea Cocks

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
2006 Frenzy RFA Commentary	Preds	Frenzy Restricted Free Agents (RFA) Declaration and Bidding	5	April 23rd, 2007 01:13 PM
Official 2006 SACD RFA Tenders	Preds	SAC'D Restricted Free Agents (RFA) Declaration and Bidding	24	April 24th, 2006 07:15 AM
2006 SACD RFA declarations	Burt the Butcher	SAC'D Restricted Free Agents (RFA) Declaration and Bidding	35	April 4th, 2006 10:55 AM
2005 SAC'D Master Trade Tracking Thread	Preds	SAC'D Trading Block	1	May 6th, 2005 06:49 AM
RFA Rules and Tender details	Preds	Frenzy Restricted Free Agents (RFA) Declaration and Bidding	0	March 15th, 2004 01:25 PM