![]() |
|
|||||
| Feeding Frenzy League Sites |
| 2009 Feeding Frenzy |
| 2008 Feeding Frenzy |
| 2007 Feeding Frenzy |
| 2006 Feeding Frenzy |
| SAC'D League Sites |
| 2009 SAC'D |
| 2008 SAC'D |
| 2007 SAC'D |
| 2006 SAC'D |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
SAC'D
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 3,488
![]() |
The rules state that Supplemental Draft picks are developmental squad eligible. I interpreted this to mean that since we gave up a 2011 5th round pick, that we could place Unga on our PS and count it toward one of our two 2011 PS placements (we're already placing two guys on the PS from the 2010 draft). Do the other SACD owners agree with this interpretation? Burt asked me to post this since the rules are not specific on this particular scenario.
__________________
Don't piss off old people. The older we get, the less "life in prison" is a deterrent.
|
|
|
|
| pacificscrub |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by pacificscrub |
|
|
#2 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado Springs Co
Posts: 6,746
![]() |
I would say, if your giving up a draft pick next year for this, then i see thi scountign as one of your PS players for next year, and as long as you only now get one PS assingment for next year, then i'm good with that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 6,050
![]() |
I'd be game with that.
__________________
Bay Area Bloodsucking Insects - 1st EVER Feeding Frenzy Champion Bay Area Bloodsuckers 2008 SAC'D Champions - 2nd Worst to First in Year! 2011 SAC'D Champions - #5 seed, # 2 power rankings, #1 in the end! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
General Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,325
![]() |
I would have to STRONGLY disagree..
I am okay with that player going on the PS squad (since it was a 5th round pick .. even if it was a future pick), however, I don't see why that would trump the rule about ONLY placing 2 5th or 6th round picks on the PS for THIS draft! The PS rules seem crystal clear about that: "Players can only be placed on the Practice Squad from the annual rookie draft, and only 5th and 6th round selections are eligible for the Practice Squad. Only two players per team can be placed on the Practice Squad each year, so if a team has acquired more than two 5th and 6th round picks through compensation or trade, only two such picks would be eligible for the Practice Squad."
__________________
Hans Sorensen PencilGeeks "They got exits covered. All the exits underground. I wish I could figure it out. But the world's upside down" - Foals |
|
|
|
| PencilGeeks |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by PencilGeeks |
|
|
#5 |
|
Frenzy and SAC'D
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 17,307
![]() |
I agree with Geeks.
The pick is actually for this year. You're just giving up next year's draft pick to make the pick this year. The rule does need to be edited. Maybe something like: "Players can only be placed on the Practice Squad from the annual rookie draft and supplemental draft. Only 5th and 6th round selections are eligible for the Practice Squad. Only two players per team can be placed on the Practice Squad each year, so if a team has acquired more than two 5th and 6th round picks (including RFA compensation, supplemental picks and trades), only two such picks would be eligible for the Practice Squad." |
|
|
|
| Liquid Swords |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Liquid Swords |
|
|
#6 |
|
SAC'D
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,767
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado Springs Co
Posts: 6,746
![]() |
ok, then if we do that, then if he somehow obatains another 5th round pick, then he still has both PS spots available for next years draft.
And, this definately needs to be in a rules update, as per it is written, you could easily argue either way on this one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
SAC'D
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 2,576
![]() |
As much as it pains me to do it, I agree with THE GEEKS as well. And I feel the rule does need to be updated as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Supreme FF Dominator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Falcon, Colorado
Posts: 19,481
![]() |
I guess I would have to agree with majority here...after re-reading the rule, the intent of it seems to be to only allow 2 PS assignments per year. I like Patricks suggestion for rewording it to include supplemental picks.
As this was first supplemental draft in SAC'd history, I am willing to let Clowns take back their bid, and put Unga into FA pool, as theirs was the only bid made.
__________________
What's the point in calling shots His cue ain't straight in line Cue balls made of Styrofoam And no ones got the time OUT---
|
|
|
|
| Burt the Butcher |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Burt the Butcher |
|
|
#10 |
|
SAC'D
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 3,488
![]() |
Sorry for the misunderstanding. Should have clarified with the commish before bidding. I will go ahead and withdraw the bid and will check beforehand next time.
__________________
Don't piss off old people. The older we get, the less "life in prison" is a deterrent.
|
|
|
|
| pacificscrub |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by pacificscrub |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2008 rules updating plan | Popes | Frenzy Rules & Bylaws | 2 | March 7th, 2008 06:28 PM |
| Rules clarification question... | Royal Hawaiian Opihi | Frenzy League Chat | 0 | August 25th, 2005 07:50 PM |
| 2005 Rules Discussion - Rule 6B DS Clarification | Philadelphia Freedom | Frenzy Rules & Bylaws | 8 | March 3rd, 2005 04:49 PM |
| 2004 Rules Updated w/Revised Timelines | Preds | Frenzy Rules & Bylaws | 0 | August 28th, 2004 11:00 AM |
| League Rules | Skippy the One Eyed Beagle | Football News & Notes | 3 | April 15th, 2004 03:40 PM |


